Home > Word 2003 > Word 2003 Hyperlinks Stripped In Outlook 2003

Word 2003 Hyperlinks Stripped In Outlook 2003

HTML belongs on the web, not in our Word documents or e-mail. Thinking they have placated the internet community by showing a hint of deference to web standards with IE7, they are now determined to ride roughshod over everyone by making Outlook as Thursday, September 22, 2011 8:19 AM Reply | Quote 0 Sign in to vote Hello, There is no resulting HTML file. While I agree with Karl concerning the use of HTML in email, I have clients that want fancy email, so I'm stuck validating it. news

The only reason why I see the need to use MS Word instead of IE7's rendering engine is because that would mean that IE7 would have to be available for the Best of both worlds. When you install Outlook, it will detect if Word is installed as well. However, none of these features were available in the classic Outlook editor either.

djeglin Microsofts reasoning may indeed be that they feel this makes sense for their end users, however the most that the majority of "end users" ever make of html email is Contacting Quest Support: Quest Support is available to customers who have a trial version of a Quest product or who have purchased a Quest product and have a valid maintenance contract. That’s right. I have been sent thousands of those stock spam but Thunderbird doesn't show attachments inline.

Would it be that hard to read a doctype attribute in the email and switch rendering engines based on the content or something? Please start a New Thread if you're having a similar issue.View our Welcome Guide to learn how to use this site. Note: The document will become available after the user who uploaded the document performs check in. Generated Sat, 18 Mar 2017 11:25:20 GMT by s_hv884 (squid/3.5.20)

If the email is converted to HTML format, then attachments will be processed. Dumbhtmlhead Add the following plain text header to all future HTML emails: If this email looks like sh*t, it is because you are using a non-standards-compliant email client. Also, if you open the email in Outlook 2003 it looks fine. I'm developing some InfoPath 2007 forms to send via email.

That's your own feeling and you're entitled to it. Meet the author Kevin Yank Kevin began developing for the Web in 1995 and is a highly respected technical author. You can say email "should" be text only. For one, their validator seems to disagree with their compatibilites article (I'm using Visual Studio).

  1. malikyte Matt Brindley of SiteVista (ala browsershots/browsercam with more features) has announced their EmailVista application.
  2. I really can't believe they would pull a stunt like this.
  3. As they are basically abusing every trick in the book, giving them less to play with is bad news for them but good news for you and me.People who require alternative
  4. Anonymous This change doesn't kill HTML email, It only breaks background images and the CSS which is used to format the HTML and sends standard formatting into the dark ages.

So ensuring that your HTML-email has a basic display with colors and simple formatting to look at in the preview pane, and then maybe include CSS to the full blown whistle TF173554 If the target SharePoint folder URL begins with https://, email recipients from the Readers group on SharePoint may not see an uploaded to SharePoint document. Component License or Acknowledgement .NET logging library 1.0 BSD 4.4 SharePoint Solution Installer V1.2.2 Microsoft Permissive License (Ms-PL) v1.1 .NET logging library 1.0: License Text Copyright 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, In fact, you could use a "Plain text or ‘HTML mail'?" question as a simple test to separate competent computer users from incompetent computer users. (And that should have been "affect"

Here, we all have Notes. navigate to this website thank you. BWilde BWilde @Ian: "I am happy with the restrictions on images" You should add: "so that my job is easier". *For your convenience* is not a legitmate reason to the rest Microsoft should be supporting this industry instead of setting up a blockade at every opportunity.

And in my company we've found that while our pay content is readily available at our web site, the majority of clients still prefer the same articles delivered in HTML format It happens that IE7 breaks many an application that embed the Webbrowser Control. FORCING people to use the Word Rendering and controls to try and create an HTML based page with the images, text, meta-data (semantic web remember) puts it back to 1996 era More about the author The copyright addendum may be found at ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change and is included below.

Well, actually they started in the tunnels underground -- they used MSN Mail and added to it. Please contact your software provider. Where technology goes we follow.

And then they go and release an OS that really does NOT live up to expectations (Vista).

That is a depressingly Luddite attitude in a tech forum. And I could edit the source code rather than the WYSIWYG view if I wanted to. You could send ten 40 KB messages in HTML or you could send 100 in plain text. Tomsk1967, Aug 19, 2004 #1 DaveBurnett Account Closed Joined: Nov 11, 2002 Messages: 12,970 Security by MS turned on by default in the final version.

I can't edit the source. You could actually reach 90 more for the same money by sending plain text. Ratti Mail is a TEXT(!)-format. click site Writing HTML email has been getting more difficult with the increase of webmail - many of whom don't support a lot of styling features - but this looks like it is

The sooner they follow up on this by switching to a secure HTML renderer for Internet Explorer the better. Also, what affect will this have on Outlook Express (renamed "Windows Mail") which more people have installed on their personal PC's? If you have already registered your product then please contact Customer Service directly for further assistance at [email protected] Some posts in Google Groups label this the "Image Bloat" bug.

Click on the Signatures button and this will open up the Signatures and Stationary window. 3. E-mail is basically another form of delievering media and this is a huge step back. Do you think MS would implement a PDF renderer any better than they implemented an HTML Renderer? Chris I think it's just pure laziness and pig-headedness on behalf of Microsoft - They've been getting very good at that lately (more-so than usual).

Maki That is good news, not BAD news. Also: if your email or newsletter's non-HTML section is blank or only reads "Please click the following link to view an online version of this email: http://…", it's going to be as humans we are very visually oriented - attractive marketing bombards us from all directions, and if something is not eye-catching, it will simply be overlooked in most instances. In YOUR world.

So, the HTML code above maps the URL hotspots in the image. I'm having flashbacks to the old days when you had to deliver "special" content to AOL users. No one seems to be suggesting that we step up to the mark and actually stop moaning about this and see it as a business opportunity. TF94538 Embedded attachments within an email in rich-text format are not processed in Outlook 2007 and Outlook 2010.