Learning Theory Module

Designed by: JoAnn Gonzalez-Major
Last updated on: November 21, 2005

 

Other Resources

"To cope with a changing world, an entity must develop the capacity of shifting and changing - of developing new skills and attitudes; in short, the capability of learning." - A De Gues, The Living Company

 

What Would Gagne and the Boys Have to Say

 

learning theorists

One of the things you’ve already learned from experience is that when you mix technology with teaching and learning it becomes a complex process that defies simple explanations. Your Instructional Technology textbooks are jammed with theories and models, but the take-home lesson is that no one view of what goes on in classrooms and heads is sufficient to capture it all.

Learning about each model and philosophy of learning gives you different windows through which to observe this interesting scene. In this exercise you’ll take on a little of the viewpoint and persona of four educational thinkers and try to picture what they would say about specific web-based lessons.

The Scenario

meeting of the minds castYears ago on public television there was a program hosted by Steve Allen called  “Meeting of Minds”. Each week, actors portraying a number of characters from history would sit around a table and discuss a topic from each of their point of view. On a given show, you might find Socrates, Mark Twain, Churchill and Madame Curie discussing curiosity or poverty. It was an interesting show, one that deserves to be replicated.

The Task

Between the start of the term and your team presentation date you’ll create a small-scale version of the same thing, with four of the following luminaries sitting around the table: B. F. Skinner, Jean Piaget, Jerome Bruner, John Dewey, Seymour Papert, Lev Vygotsky, Robert Gagne, Edward Thorndike and Howard Gardner. The topic of discussion: a particular lesson that uses technology. The choice of which four theoreticians that you will channel will be up to your group.

The Process

First, you will divide up into groups of 4. Within that group, you’ll each bone up on one of the guest star theoreticians. To get up to speed you’ll do some reading from the Web and selected articles.  

To assist you in selecting a theoretician a short biography has been noted next to to each of their pictures, and some general online resources have been provided.

Benjamin Bloom

bloomBenjamin Bloom, an educational psychologist, focused his research on students' cognitive learning domain. Bloom and a group of psychologists sought to classify learning behaviors to better understand how knowledge is absorbed. Bloom classified learning into three domains: cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. Bloom defined the cognitive domain as a student's intellectual level, in other words, what they know and how they organize their ideas and thoughts. He defined the affective domain as a student's emotions, interests, attitude, attention, and awareness. Finally, he categorized the psychomotor domain, which would include a student's motor skills and physical abilities. All of these domains can overlap in learning activities and are integrated throughout learning experiences.

Jerome Bruner

Jerome Bruner proposed that learning is an active process in which the learner constructs new ideas or concepts based on their current or past knowledge. Bruner believes that Constructivist learners are active learners; they are actively engaged in the learning process. Constructivism emphasizes an integrated curriculum where students learn a subject in various ways or through many different activities.

John Dewey

John DeweyJohn Dewey has significantly influenced American education. He was an educational psychologist, philosopher, and political activist who was an advocate for child-centered instruction. He believed that learning should engage and expand the experiences of the learners. He encourages educators to reflect on their strategies and create activities that combine concrete and practical relevance to their lives.

Like Vygotsky, Dewey beleived that education was a social process. He viewed school as a community that represented a larger picture. In 1896, Dewey began the University Elementary School or Laboratory School, many educators called this school the Dewey School.

Robert Gagne

Robert GagneRobert Gagne, a psychologist and educator, developed his learning theories based partially from behaviorist's points of view. He made an enormous contribution to learning theory and instructional systems design. While in the Air Force, he began to develop some of his ideas for his comprehensive learning theory. He incorporated characteristics of both behavior modification theory as well as performance education. Gagne developed three principles that he viewed as integral for successful instruction: (1) providing instruction on the set of component tasks that build toward a final task, (2) ensuring that each component task is mastered, and (3) sequencing the component tasks to ensure optimal transfer to the final task.

Howard Gardner

Howard GardnerHoward Gardner, a professor at Harvard University, has conducted years of research on normal and gifted students and also studied adults with brain damage. In those who had been injured, he wanted to correlate what part of the brain had been injured and how their physical injury affected learning and other physical abilities. Through his research, he concluded there were eight different intelligences that individuals use to perceive and understand the world.

Jean Piaget

Jean PiagetJean Piaget, profoundly influenced the Constructivist movement. Piaget was a psychologist who developed the cognitive learning theory after many years of observing children. He perceived that children think very differently from adults. Piaget believed that children were constructing new knowledge as they moved through different cognitive stages, building on what they already know.

B. F. Skinner

B. F. Skinner B. F. Skinner, made may contributions to the field of psychology, including the theory of behavioral or operant conditioning. Operant conditioning is when learning is controlled and results in shaping behavior through the reinforcement of stimulus response patterns. Skinner believed that people shape their behavior based on the rewards or positive reinforcement they receive.

Edward Thorndike

Edward ThorndikeEdward Thorndike developed psychological connectionism. He believed that through experience neural bonds or connections were formed between perceived stimuli and emitted responses; therefore, intellect facilitated the formation of the neural bonds. People of higher intellect could form more bonds and form them more easily than people of lower ability.

Lev Vygotsky

Lev VygotskyLev Vygotsky, developed what is know as social Constructivist theory. While his ideas overlapped in may ways with the traditional constructivists' point of view, Vygotsky believed that learning was significantly influenced by social development. He theorized that learning took place within the context of a child's social development and culture.

 

Next Steps

Next, each team will examine one of the following technology-based units:

Next, download the PowerPoint template for creating your Meeting of Minds. (You are not limited to using this template, all teams are encouraged to design their own.)

For each of the four theorists, ask yourself …

In making your simulated Meeting of Minds, you’ll duplicate each slide as many times as you need it to create a cartoon-ish representation of give and take.

Each team will also act as the discussion moderators for their assigned week. Please post your shows as early as possible, so that your peers have an opportunity to view the show and engage in a dialog with your team (remember to stay in character) .

Each team will facilitate their show segments by presenting their assessment to the group, posing questions, addressing peer comments, and providing a recap at the end of the session.

Evaluation

Your assessment will be based on:

  1. Understanding and utilization of the assigned theoretical framework
  2. Presentation of findings
  3. Depth of presentation
  4. References
  5. Ability to generate an interactive class discussion
  6. Ability to field audience questions in character